Legal frameworks promoting innovation: Comparative analysis of national innovation systems
Palavras-chave:
Transformação Digital, Propriedade Intelectual, Apoio Legislativo, Sistemas Nacionais de Inovação, Inovação TecnológicaResumo
No mundo globalizado de hoje, a inovação é essencial para o crescimento econômico e a competitividade de um país. Um sistema jurídico eficaz que incentive o progresso tecnológico e a investigação é fundamental para o sucesso da inovação. Através de um estudo comparativo dos sistemas nacionais de inovação, pode-se encontrar a melhor experiência de apoio legislativo à inovação e desenvolver propostas para melhorar o ambiente legal para a inovação nos níveis nacional e internacional. Este estudo também destaca a importância de abordar barreiras como a burocracia e a fraca integração entre as comunidades científica e empresarial. Enfatiza o papel das parcerias público-privadas e do apoio governamental na promoção de ecossistemas de inovação. No processo de pesquisa, foram aplicados métodos de análise, síntese, indução, dedução, método dialético, método analítico, método de analogia, método de abstração e generalização. O artigo tem como objetivo analisar diferentes modelos de regulamentação legal da atividade de inovação no mundo, identificando seus pontos fortes e fracos, bem como formular recomendações para a adaptação das melhores práticas para melhorar o sistema nacional de inovação da Ucrânia.
Downloads
Referências
BRYS, B.; MATTHEWS, S.; HERD, R.; WANG, X. Tax Policy and Tax Reform in the People's Republic of China. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k40l4dlmnzw-en
CANADA’S NEW GOVERNMENT. Mobilizing science and technology to Canada’s advantage: executive summary. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2007.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; Dezi, L.; GREGORI, G.; CALO, E. Smart environments and techno-centric and human-centric innovations for industry and society 5.0: A quintuple helix innovation system view towards smart, sustainable, and inclusive solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021, 13(2), pp. 926–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00763-4
CARTER, I. The National Research and Innovation System in the United Kingdom: A Brief History. Journal of Research Management and Administration, 2024, 3(1), 202403092. https://doi.org/10.18552/jorma.v3i1.985
COSTA, J.; MATIAS, J. C. Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 2020, 12(19), 8112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198112
DAHESH, M. B.; TABARSA, G.; ZANDIEH, M.; Hamidizadeh, M. Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis. Technology in Society, 2020, 63, 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101399
DEI, H.; DEI, M.; KUTYNSKA, A. The role of the state in digitalization of education. Legal Horizons, 2024,19(4), pp. 8–18. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2023.4.pp.8-18
DZYUBA, O.; SHEVCHENKO, O. Economic and legal analysis of the implementation of the “Strategy for the development of the sphere of innovative activity for the period until 2030”. Economy and Society, 2021, 23. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-23-14
EKA PUTRI, C.; SIHABUDIN; WIDHIAWATI, D. Analysis of the arrangement of intellectual property-based financing schemes with copyright collateral for bank financial institutions. Legal Horizons, 2024, 20(1), pp. 49–59. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2024.1.pp.49-59
ISATAYEVA, G.; ISSAKHMETOVA A.; SADYKBEKOVA A.; UMBETALIYEV N; SABDALINA A. Comparative Analysis of Open Innovation Management: Finnish Experience and Kazakhstan’s Practice. Revista Espacios, 2018, 29(12), pp 27-29. Available at: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n12/18391227.html (accessed on 10 May 2025).
KOVALENKO, I. A. Analysis of the problems of regulating innovative activity in Ukraine. Slovo National School of Judges of Ukraine, 2022, 38–39(1-2), pp. 160–170. https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2022-1-2(38-39)-15
LEVYTSKYI, V.; RADYNSKYI, S. V.; DYACHUN, O. Regulatory and legal support for innovation and investment activities of industrial enterprises of Ukraine. Socio-Economic Problems and the State, 2022, 27(2), pp. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2022.nom2.025
LEWIS, P. Innovation, technician skills, and vocational education and training: Connecting innovation systems and vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 2023, pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2215749
LUPAK, R. L.; RUDKOVSKY, O. V.; VASYLTSIV, T. G.; BEREZIVSKYI, Ya. P. Institutional and innovative factors of technological development of the national economy of Ukraine in the context of global informatization. Business Inform, 2021, 1, pp. 103–112. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-1-103-112
LYUBCHYCH, A. M.; OHIENKO, I. V.; HOLOVASHCHENKO, O. S. Legislative changes regarding the formation of priority areas of scientific, scientific-technical, and innovative activities. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 2024, 3, pp. 647–651. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.03.109
MALERBA, F.; MCKELVEY, M. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 2020, 54(2), pp. 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2
MUSIOLIK, J.; MARKARD, J.; HEKKERT, M.; FURRER, B. Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 153, 119209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002
NATIONAL PEOPLE’S CONGRESS. Law of the People’s Republic of China on scientific and technological progress. Beijing, 2021. Available at: http://en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn/2021-12/24/c_924633.htm (accessed on 10 May 2025).
NATIONAL PEOPLE’S CONGRESS. Law on the advancement of science and technology of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing, 1993. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/22967 (accessed on 10 May 2025).
OECD (2022), OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Germany 2022: Building Agility for Successful Transitions, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/50b32331-en
RAYHAN, R.; RAYHAN, S. AI and human rights: Balancing innovation and privacy in the digital age. Computer Science, 2023, 2, 353964. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35394.56001
RUMYK, I. I.; PYLYPENKO, O. O. Management of financial and economic activities of integrated enterprises on innovative principles. Academic Notes of the University “KROK”, 2021, 62(2), pp. 166–175. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2021-62-166-175
SATALKINA, L.; STEINER, G. Digital entrepreneurship and its role in innovation systems: A systematic literature review as a basis for future research avenues for sustainable transitions. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7), 2764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072764
SUN, Y. China’s national innovation system in transition. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2002, 43(6), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.43.6.476
U.S. CONGRESS. Stevenson–Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980. Washington, DC, 1980. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-9476/uslm/COMPS-9476.xml (accessed on 10 May 2025).
U.S. SENATE. H.R.10230–National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976. Washington, DC, 1976. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/94th-congress/house-bill/10230 (accessed on 10 May 2025).
WESTERSTRAHLE, P. National innovation strategy of Finland. In: ITIF Event: Benchmarking Leading Countries’ National Innovation Policies. 2007. Available at: https://www2.itif.org/ITIF_PWesterstrahle.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2025).
YAO, L.; LI, J.; LI, J. Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 160, 120185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120185
YAROSHENKO, I. V.; SEMYHULINA, I. B. Innovative approaches to the development of “smart” cities: Regulatory and legal framework in Ukraine and European experience. Problemy Ekonomiky, 2021, 48(2), pp. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2021-2-95-102
YAWSON, R. M. The ecological system of innovation: A new architectural framework for a functional evidence-based platform for science and innovation policy. In: Huizingh, K. R. E.; Conn, S.; Torkkeli, M.; Bitran, I. (eds.). The Future of Innovation. Proceedings of XX ISPIM 2009 Conference. Vienna: University of Minnesota, 2021, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1957.1527
YIN, X.; CHEN, J.; LI, J. Rural innovation system: Revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 93, pp. 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrii V. Honcharov, Dmytro Ye. Vysotskyi, Vitaliy V. Gumenyuk, Nelia Ye. Makovetska, Diana I. Timush
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
The authors cede all their copyrights to the magazine Cadernos de Dereito Actual, which will be in charge of disseminating and always quoting the author.
The authors agree not to send the article or publish it in another magazine.
The authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work, provided that reference is made to Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
All contents published in the magazine are protected under a "Creative Commons - Attribution - Non-Commercial" license. Everyone has the right to freely access the contents of the magazine.
