The Tanzimat paradox: Legal dualism and the dilemma of westernization in Ottoman modernization
Keywords:
Tanzimat, Modernization, Westernization, Legal Dualism, Majalla Al-Ahkam Al-Adliyya, Non-Western Modernity, Ottoman Legal ReformAbstract
This article reexamines the conventional equation of modernization with Westernization that has long shaped interpretations of Ottoman legal reform during the Tanzimat period (1839–1876). Drawing upon a comparative examination of key legal texts, including the Tanzimat Edict (1839), the Islahat Edict (1856), the Ottoman Commercial Code (1850), and the Majalla al-Ahkam al-Adliyya (1869–1876), the study evaluates their relationship to selected provisions of the modern Turkish Civil Code in order to identify both continuities and transformations in legal thought. The Majalla’s Articles 8, 20, 22, 30, 36, and 39 embody principles that closely resemble contemporary legal doctrines, including the presumption of innocence, tort liability, necessity, public interest, custom as a source of law, and the adaptability of legal rulings to changing circumstances. These examples demonstrate that Islamic legal principles could be codified in a systematic and modern form without requiring the abandonment of their substantive foundations. The article contends that the abolition of the Majalla in 1926 was driven primarily by the ideological orientation of radical Westernization, although administrative and institutional considerations also contributed to the decision. More broadly, the Ottoman experience indicates that modernization and legal development need not necessarily entail comprehensive Westernization. The Tanzimat reforms, therefore, offer an important historical perspective for contemporary debates on legal modernization in non-Western societies.
Downloads
References
Adams, Maurice & Van Hoecke, Mark (eds). “Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802201468
Ahmed Cevdet Paşa. Ma'rûzât, ed. “Yusuf Halaçoğlu”, İstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1980, 75-78. ISBN: 9789944118958. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/408146476/Cevdet-Pas-a-Ma-ruzat-pdf (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Ahmet Cevdet Pasa. “Mecelle-yi Ahkâm-ı Adliyye”, Dersaadet, 1315, 1887, 27. Available at: https://archive.org/details/mecelleyiahkmiad00turk/page/30/mode/2up (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Ahmet Kilinc. “The Influence of the Ottoman State on Islamic Law”, YBHD, 7 (2), 2022, 567. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2319546 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Ahmet Yaman. “Fıkhın Hayatı Belirleme Mücadelesinin Sembol ama Bahtsız İsmi: MECELLE-İ AHKÂM-I ADLİYYE”, Tevilat, Selçuk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6 (2), 2025, 578. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/5371363 (accessed on 11 March 2026).
Alberto Martinelli. “Global Modernization: Rethinking the project of modernity”, London: SAGE Publications, 2005, 7. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216583
Andrew Heywood. “Global Politics”, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 253. ISBN 1403989826, 9781403989826. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/32451960/Andrew_Heywood_Global_Politics (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Andrew Wheatcroft, The Ottomans: Dissolving Images, New York: Viking Penguin, 1993, 167. ISBN: 0140168796, 9780140168792. Available at: https://archive.org/details/ottomansdissolvi0000whea (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Anthony Giddens & Christopher Pierson, “Making Sense of Modernity”, London: Polity, 2013, 23. Available at: https://archive.org/details/conversationswit0000gidd (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Bernard Lewis. “The Emergence of Modern Turkey”, London: Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2001, 58. ISBN: 978-0-19-513459-9. Available at: https://archive.org/details/emergenceofmoder00bern (accessed on 8 March 2026).
Bülent Tanör. “Osmanlı-Türk Anayasal Gelişmeleri”, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002),85-100. ISBN: 9789753636889. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/497655693/Bulent-Tanor-Osmanlı-Turk-Anayasal-Gelişmeleri (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Carter Vaughn Findley. “Turkey, Islam, Nationalism, and Modernity: History, 1789-2007”, London: Yale University Press, 2010, 45. ISBN: 0300152620, 9780300152623. Available at: https://dokumen.pub/turkey-islam-nationalism-and-modernity-a-history-1789-2007-0300152604-9780300152609.html (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Ebül'ulâ Mardin. “Medenî Hukuk Cephesinden Ahmet Cevdet Paşa”, Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2012, 42-45. ISBN: 9789753892346 https://edb.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/Dergi/21102021113049Medeni%20Hukuk%20Cephesinden%20Ahmet%20Cevdet%20Pa%C5%9Fa.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, “Ottomans and European Science”, Science and Empires, Vol.136, 1992, 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2594-9_6
Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu. “Osmanlı Modernleşmesinde İlk Adımlar Teknoloji”, Bilim ve Eğitim, İstanbul: Ötüken, 2022, 355. ISBN: 978-625-408-238-2. Available at: https://www.otuken.com.tr/u/otuken/docs/o/s/osmanli-modernlesmesinde-ilk-adimlar-1643289779.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqM6POVwoM1Q6LQ4yYwPuang5ilYhlcRKXBwpFYYk0VLh1GF2wz (accessed on 9 March 2026).
Emir Efe Egemen. “Bir Örfî Hukuk Düzenlemesi Olarak Mecelle’nin Kavâid-i Külliyesi ve Hukukun Genel İlkeleri”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 2023, 181. https://doi.org/10.47130/bitlissos.1240184
Fahri Erdem Kaşak. “Hâkimin Karar Verirken Bilimsel Görüşlerden Yararlanması (TMK m. 1/III)”, İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, 79 (4), 2021, 1130. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ihm/article/1049831 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Fernand Braudel. “A History of Civilization”, translated from French by Richard Mayne, London: Penguin Books, 1995, 123. Available at: https://archive.org/details/historyofciviliz00brau/page/n5/mode/2up (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Fikret Eren. “Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler”, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları, 2023, 482. ISBN:6050506809, 9786050506808. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/758677923/FI-KRET-EREN-BORC-LAR-HUKUKU-GENEL-HU-KU-MLER (accessed on 7 March 2026).
Güher Ulu. “Tanzimat Dönemi Hukukta Modernleşme”. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 26(1), 2021, 254. https://doi.org/10.20296/tsadergisi.760507
Gülnihal Bozkurt. “Batı Hukukunun Türkiye'de Benimsenmesi”, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2010, 67-69. ISBN: 9789751607027. Available at: https://kutuphane.ttk.gov.tr/details?id=461708&materialType=KT&query=Bozkurt%2C+Gülnihal (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Hafsa Keskin. “Modern Hukuk ve İslâm Hukuku’nda Hâkimin Hukuk İhdâsı”. Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, (2), 2025, 1122 https://doi.org/10.60002/ebyuhfd.1682195
Halil Inalcik, Suraiya Faroqhi, Bruce McGowan, Donald Quataert, Sevket Pamuk. “An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 639. Available at: https://archive.org/details/economicsocialhi0002unse_j7n1/page/n9/mode/2up (accessed on 11 March 2026).
İlber Ortaylı. “İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı”, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2003, 100-105.ISBN: 978-975-2430-36-5. Available at: https://archive.org/details/ilber-ortayli-imparatorlugun-en-uzun-yuzyili (accessed on 12 March 2026).
International Encyclopaedia of the Social Science, 2nd edition, “Modernity” (2008). Available at: http://elibrary.bsu.edu.az/files/books_163/N_117.pdf (accessed on 9 March 2026).
İzzet Özgenç, “Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler”, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2024, 499. Available at: https://izzetozgenc.com/data/books/turk-ceza-hukuku-ceza-hukukuna-giris-suc-teorisi-yaptirim-teorisi-milletlerarasi-ceza-hukuku-20-basi.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2026).
Jürgen Habermas. “Modernity: An Incomplete Project”, in The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster, Washington: Bay Press, 1983, 35. ISBN: 9781315845739. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56aa69733c44d876d31d54de/t/64a080fb6a3f353cd01c6b50/1688240385682/Habermas%2C+Modernity-An+Incomplete+Project.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Kanunlar ve Kararlar Başkanlığı. “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası” Ankara: TBMM Basımevi, 2020, 37. Available at: https://cdn.tbmm.gov.tr/TbmmWeb/Yayinlar/Dosya/0e96a18f-24e8-41dd-ae87-18e19e3f4eb9.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2026).
Krishan Kumar. “From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World”, United States: Blackwell Publishing, 1995, 91. Available at: https://archive.org/details/frompostindustri0000kuma (accessed on 2 March 2026).
Mark Van Hoecke, “Deep Level Comparative Law”, In Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law, edited by Mark Van Hoecke, Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2004. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2072346 (accessed on 2 March 2026).
Mücahit Ceylan. “Mecelle-i Ahkâm-ı Adliyye'nin Hazırlanışı, Uygulanması ve Kapsamı”, Adalet Dergisi, 66, 2021, 716. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1779917 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Niyazi Berkes. “The Development of Secularism in Turkey”, Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964, 214. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ch7679 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Osman Kaşıkçı. “İslâm ve Osmanlı Hukukunda Mecelle”, İstanbul: Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı Yayınları, 1997, 386. 116. ISBN: 9789757268185 Available at: https://katalogkanuni.taa.gov.tr/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:11734/ada?qu=İslam+hukuku&d=ent%3A%2F%2FSD_ILS%2F0%2FSD_ILS%3A11734%7EILS%7E173&ic=true&dt=list&ps=300&st=PD&h=8 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Partha Chatterjee. “The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories”, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993. Available at: https://archive.org/details/nationanditsfragmentscolonialandpostcolonialhistoriesparthachatterjee_735_n (accessed on 9 March 2026).
Rifqi Khairul Anam & Fareed Ahmad Obaid. “The Dynamics of Legal Standardization: A Study of Statutory Codification and Administrative Authority”, Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law, 7 2, 2025, 92. Available at: https://ijlil.uinkhas.ac.id/index.php/ijl/article/view/462/98 (accessed on 9 March 2026).
S.N Eisen Eisenstadt. “Multiple Modernities”, Daedalus/ Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 129 (1), 2000. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027613 (accessed on 1 March 2026).
Sadik Kocabaş. “Mecelle-i Ahkâm-ı Adliye: Hazırlanışı, in Aktörleri ve İçeriği in Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimlerde Araştırma ve Değerlendirmeler – III”, Ankara: Gece Kitapligi, 2021, 57-68. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357680668 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Samuel P. Huntington. “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order”, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996, 96-97. ISBN 0-684-81164-2. Available at: https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/1993SamuelPHuntingtonTheClashOfCivilizationsAndTheRemakingofWorldOrder.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Samy A. Ayoub. "The Ottoman Rationale for Codification: The Mecelle", in Law, Empire, and the Sultan, Ottoman Imperial Authority and Late Hanafi Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 132. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190092924.003.0005
Selami Aykul. “Külli Kaideler Bağlamında Rekabet Hukukunun Temel İlkeleri”, Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi 9/2, Aralık 2025, 362. https://doi.org/10.64270/kider.1789756
Şerif Mardin. “Türk Modernleşmesi”, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınlan, 1991, 10. ISBN: 975-470-057-5. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/44707307/ŞERİF_MARDİN_T_Ü_R_K_M_O_D_ER_N_LEŞM_E_Sİ_Makaleler_4_İ_l_e_t_iş_i_m_Y_a_y_ın_la_n (accessed on 5 March 2026).
Shaw Stanford. “Between Old and New: The Ottoman Empire Under Sultan Selim III 1789-1807”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971, 180. Available at: https://archive.org/details/isbn_674068300/page/n9/mode/2up (accessed on 10 March 2026).
Süleyman Tepe, Veysel K. Bilgiç. “Mecelle’nin Külli Kaideleri Bağlamında Örf ve Âdet Hukukunun İşlevleri.” ASBÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6, 2, 2025, 1116. https://doi.org/10.47136/asbuhfd.1575198
TÜRK BORÇLAR KANUNU, Kanun No. 6098. Available at: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6098.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Türk Ceza Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 5237. Available at: https://mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=5237&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5 (accessed on 11 March 2026).
Türk Medeni Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 4721. Available at: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=4721&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5 (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Ulvu Rahimli. “Mejelle-i Ahkam-ı Adliyye from a Historical Perspective”, Reconstructing the Past: Journal of Historical Studies, 3 (2), 2025, 6-7. Available at: https://jhs.wcu.edu.az/uploads/files/Ulvu%20Rahimli2%205.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2026).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Esra Polat Onbasi, Alparslan Onbasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
The authors cede all their copyrights to the magazine Cadernos de Dereito Actual, which will be in charge of disseminating and always quoting the author.
The authors agree not to send the article or publish it in another magazine.
The authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work, provided that reference is made to Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
All contents published in the magazine are protected under a "Creative Commons - Attribution - Non-Commercial" license. Everyone has the right to freely access the contents of the magazine.
