Disciplinary responsibility of a serviceman as a consequence of committing a criminal or administrative offense under the legal regime of martial law
Palabras clave:
Military Service, Disciplinary Responsibility, Engel Criteria, Commander’s Discretion, Reasoning Of Disciplinary Decisions, Judicial Review, Martial LawResumen
This paper studies the legal nature, functional models, and limits of disciplinary responsibility of servicemen under martial law. Research methods include legal-dogmatic analysis, interpretation of law enforcement practice, content analysis, and descriptive statistical analysis. The empirical base consists of 42 disciplinary orders and 186 independentcourt decisions rendered from 2022 to 2025; a subset of 88 judicial cases was additionally assessed under the Engel criteria. The results indicate that disciplinary responsibility operates through three functional models: operational, primary, and additional. The operational model applies while another legally prescribed procedure remains pending, whereas the primary model constitutes the completed response in cases governed by Article 15 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. The additional model accompanies another legally distinct procedure without replacing it.The paper also reveals that 78.6% of the analyzed disciplinary orders contain formal or partial reasoning, indicating a recurrent weakness in their documented justification rather than a demonstrated effect on subsequent judicial review. The Engel-based assessment showed that 68.2% of sanctions had predominantly internal-service effects, 22.7% involved identifiable material or service-related consequences, and 9.1% displayed stronger punitive characteristics. The study conceptualizes disciplinary responsibility as an autonomous instrument of military governance and substantiates the necessity of clarifying reasoning standards, procedural safeguards, and the limits of commanders’ discretion.
Descargas
Referencias
ABDELAZIZ, G. M., and ABOUAHMED, A. “The punitive power of independent administrative authorities: Focus on financial and tax violations (A comparative study)”. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, v. 7, n. 2, 2024, pp. 301-324. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.2-n000216
Amalia, R. W., and Anditya, A. W. “The interrelation between military discipline infraction and military criminal charge in Indonesia”. Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, v. 7, n. 2, 2024, pp. 236-262. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v7i2.33048
CHERKASY DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 580/8490/23 (Disciplinary sanction for breach of reporting procedure after leave; typical standalone disciplinary case), 2024. Available at: https://zakononline.ua/court-decisions/show/116518189 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
CHERNIHIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 620/3654/25 (Challenge of disciplinary sanction “reprimand”; evidentiary standards of official investigation findings), 2025. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/127978580/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Chomicki, S. “Criminal and disciplinary liability of a soldier and an officer in the light of the ne bis in idem principle”. De Securitate et Defensione.Security and Defence, v. 7, n. 2, 2021, pp. 134-148. https://doi.org/10.34739/dsd.2021.02.09
Corn, G. S., and Vanlandingham, R. E. “Strengthening American war crimes accountability”. American University Law Review, v. 70, n. 2, 2020, pp. 1-45. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol70/iss2/1 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Engel and Others v. the Netherlands (Applications nos. 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72, 5370/72), 1976. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57479 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Derogation in time of emergency (Factsheet), 2022. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_derogation_eng (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Goss, R. “The Engel criteria in the 21st century: Irrational flexibility and deference in recent European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence”. Human Rights Law Review, v. 25, n. 4, 2025, art. no. ngaf031. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf031
Graat, J., and Luchtman, M. “Ne bis in idem”, In P. Caeiro, S. Gless, V. Mitsilegas, M. J. Costa, J. DE SNAJDER, G. THEODORAKAKOU (Eds.), Elgar encyclopedia of crime and criminal justice. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024, pp. 685-702. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902990.ne.bis.in.idem
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS. “Commentary on Article 117: Applicable legislation and the prohibition of double jeopardy”. In Convention (IV) relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. Geneva, 12 August 1949. ICRC, 2025. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949/article-117/commentary/2025 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
KHARKIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 520/24636/25 (Challenge of reprimand imposed by order “on disciplinary results”; minimum procedural guarantees), 2025. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/131738304/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
KULMACZEWSKI, S. “Non-judicial measures of legal reaction in the military domain as a contribution to the discussion on the values of military law”. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, v. 50, n. 3, 2026, pp. 521-564. Available at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/siulj/vol50/iss3/5/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Kuryliuk, Y., Nikolaienko, T., Prytula, A., Karpenko, M., and Kushnir, Y. “Criteria for differentiating administrative and criminal liability for unauthorized abandonment of a military unit”. Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, v. 4, n. 50, 2025, pp. 161-175. Available at: https://dspace.nadpsu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5643 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
LVIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 380/9520/24 (Recognition as unlawful and annulment of provisions of orders, including disciplinary sanction and related payments). 2025. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/127090481/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Meclea, M.-A., and Toader, D. “Disciplinary liability of the military personnel”. Scientific Research and Education in the Air Force – AFASES 2019, v. 21, n. 4, 2019, pp. 125-134. https://doi.org/10.19062/2247-3173.2019.21.4
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE OF UKRAINE. On approval of the procedure for conducting official investigations in the Armed Forces of Ukraine (Order No. 608), 2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z1503-17 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Moisiiev, M. “Criteria for distinguishing between administrative and disciplinary liability of servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine”. Slovo of the National School of Judges of Ukraine, v. 4, n. 49, 2024, pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2024-4(49)-8
Rosenblatt, F. D. “Nonjudicial punishment”. Villanova Law Review, v. 68, n. 5, 2024, pp. 807-826. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol68/iss5/4 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Shchokin, R., Soloviov, O., and Tantsiura, I. “Strengthening cooperation between the civilian and military sectors in the context of state security: Benefits and challenges”. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, v. 83, 2023, pp. 155-170. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.83.11
SUPREME COURT (Administrative Cassation Court). Decision in case No. 1.380.2019.000616, 2021. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94973787 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
SUPREME COURT (Administrative Cassation Court). Decision in case No. 640/21562/21. Protocol.ua, 2023a. Available at: https://protocol.ua/ua/postanova_kas_vp_vid_20_04_2023_roku_u_spravi_640_21562_21_1/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
SUPREME COURT (Administrative Cassation Court). Decision in case No. 420/15045/21 (Grounds of disciplinary liability and limits of judicial review), 2023b. Available at: https://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=112184734 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
SUPREME COURT (Administrative Cassation Court). Decision in case No. 460/13859/21 (Cassation review concerning commander’s orders and consequences of disciplinary decisions), 2024. Available at: https://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?d=5&red=100003bf3cbecdc5ffba710325e88a79df39a1®num=116553295 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
SZUPJANA, M., and BURDIN, W. “Prawo karne Ukrainy w realiach wojny (2022-2023). Odpowiedź na wyzwania [Criminal law of Ukraine in the realities of war (2022-2023): A response to challenges]”. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio G – Ius, v. 70, n. 3, 2023, pp. 181-194. https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2023.70.3.181-194
Turmo, A. “Ne bis in idem in European law: A difficult exercise in constitutional pluralism”. European Papers, v. 5, n. 3, 2020, pp. 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/429
VAN Bockel, W. B. The ne bis in idem principle in EU law: A conceptual and jurisprudential analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School, 2009. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13844 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
VELYKOPYSARIVSKYI DISTRICT COURT OF SUMY REGION. Decision in case No. 575/1/23 (Closure of proceedings), 2023b. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108213964 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
VELYKOPYSARIVSKYI DISTRICT COURT OF SUMY REGION. Decision in case No. 575/16/23 (Closure of proceedings), 2023a. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108395693 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. “Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. Article 15, 1984. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/80731-10 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. On the Disciplinary Statute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (Law No. 551–XIV), 1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/551-14 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Villiger, M. E. “Guarantees of a fair trial (Article 6 of the Convention) – I. Applicability and scope of the procedural rights”. In M. E. Villiger (Ed.), Handbook on the European Convention on Human Rights. Brill | Nijhoff, 2022, pp. 312-333. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004443839_017
VINNYTSIA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 120/586/24 (Annulment of disciplinary sanctions “reprimand/severe reprimand”and related bonus orders), 2024. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/120151829/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
VINNYTSIA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. Decision in case No. 120/13381/24 (Disciplinary “reprimand”imposed without official investigation; claims for annulment of record and bonus payment), 2025. Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/124639040/ (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Voluiko, O., Shevchuk, H., Myna, V., Pelahesha, O., and Sharko, D. “Legal grounds for continuing military service by servicemen after an unauthorized abandonment of a military unit”. Cadernos de Direito Actual, v. 29, 2025, pp. 58-71. Available at: https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1382 (accessed on 20 August 2026).
Voznyk, M., Goloborodko, Y., Vlad, V., Sevruk, Y., and Rudoi, K. “Reforming military law and service in Ukraine: Lessons from the military police of other countries”. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, v. 25, n. 3, 2025, pp. 529-547. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.3.2
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Maria Koba, Olena Druchek, Oleksandr Pelahesha, Andrii Beikun, Volodymyr Myna
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los/las autores/as ceden todos sus derechos de autor a la revista Cadernos de Dereito Actual, la cual se encargará de difundir y citar siempre a su autor.
- Los autores/as se comprometen a no enviar el artículo o publicarlo en otra revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/las autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada, siempre que se haga referencia a Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
- Cadernos de Dereito Actual no se hace responsable por ninguno de los artículos publicados en caso de que el/la autor/autora hay incurrido en plagio o alguna política desleal a la hora de redactar y/o enviar su artículo. Cualquier responsabilidad civil o penal corresponderá, siempre, al autor/autora del artículo.
Todos los contenidos publicados en la revista están protegidos bajo una licencia "Creative Commons - Reconocimiento - No Comercial". Toda persona tiene derecho a acceder libremente a los contenidos de la revista.
