Penalty gradient design under China’s public security administration punishment law: A proportionality-based legal analysis
Palabras clave:
Public Security Administration Punishment Law, Penalty Gradient Adaptation, Proportionality Principle, Administrative Detention, Empirical Analysis, Comparative LawResumen
This study compares the relationship between warnings and fines and the amended public security administration punishment law in China from the perspective of the three dimensions of proportionality: suitability, necessity and balancing. It blends normative legal analysis with descriptive analysis of some 10.38 million public administrative penalty decisions issued from 2010 up to the first half of 2025; and a limited comparison between selected foreign legal schemes. The empirical analysis finds a consistent pattern of decisions based on the index of administrative detention, while there is a relatively low number of decisions on warnings. The statutory analysis also shows that there are unclear criteria for moving between sanctions, differences between the clauses linking fines to detention and restrictions on external oversight of the procedures. The findings highlight distributional and structural patterns which are meaningful to give further consideration to the proportionality principle but not indicate that any individual decisions or the penalty system as a whole is legally disproportionate. The study suggests to provide more transparent and clear sanction sequencing, criteria for decisions and review procedures, as well as an empirical evaluation of the 2025 amendments following implementation. This is because it bridges the gap between statutory design and the substantial administrative enforcement patterns and explicitly acknowledges the evidentiary constraints of administrative data publicly available.
Descargas
Referencias
ALEJANDRO, A., and ZHAO, L. “Multi-method qualitative text and discourse analysis: A methodological framework”. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 30, n. 6, 2023, pp. 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231184421
ALEXY, R. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford University Press. 2002, pp. 102–110.
Anti-Drug Law of the People’s Republic of China (2021). Available at: https://english.court.gov.cn/2015-07/17/c_761568_8.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 May 2026).
BALA, N. “Developmental evidence rules”. California Law Review. (forthcoming 2027). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6132146
BREMS, E., and LAVRYSEN, L. “‘Don’t use a sledgehammer to crack a nut’: Less restrictive means in the case law of the european court of human rights”. Human Rights Law Review, v. 15, n. 1, 2015, pp. 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu040
Constitution of the People’s Republic of China. 2018. Art. 37. Available at: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/laws_regulations/201911/20/content_WS5ed8856ec6d0b3f0e9499913.html (accessed on 11 May 2026).
CORDA, A. “The legitimacy of criminal law and the performance crises of penality”. Criminal Law Forum, v. 36, 2025, pp. 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-025-09509-2
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Case C-331/88, The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte FEDESA and Others, Judgment of 13 November 1990, ECLI:EU:C:1990:391. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?docid=96352&doclang=en (accessed on 24 April 2026).
CRESWELL, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 6th ed. Sage Publications. 2022. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270550 (accessed on 11 May 2026).
JIANG, C. X. “Beyond the ‘one-size-fits-all’ model: Reassessing securities litigation reform through comparative institutional complementarity”. UCL Discovery, 2025. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10217465/13/Jiang_10217465_thesis_id_removed.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2026).
KEITH, L.C., TATE, C.N. and POE, S. C. Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse?”. The Journal of Politics, v. 71, n. 2, 2009, pp. 644. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090513
KELSALL, J., TAN, X., BERGIN, A., CHEN, J. H., WAHEED, M., SORELL, Y., PROCTER, R., LIAKATA, M., CHIM, J., and CHI, S. “A rapid evidence review of evaluation techniques for large language models in legal use cases: Trends, gaps, and recommendations for future research”. AI & Society, v. 41, 2026, pp. 4025-4043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02741-9
Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administrative Penalty. 2021. Art. 4. Available at: https://en.spp.gov.cn/2021-01/22/c_948432.htm (accessed on 24 April 2026).
Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administrative Penalty. 2021. Art. 5. Available at: https://en.spp.gov.cn/2021-01/22/c_948432.htm (accessed on 24 April 2026).
Legislation Law of the People’s Republic of China. 2023. Art. 62. Available at: https://en.moj.gov.cn/2023-12/15/c_948358.htm (accessed on 24 April 2026).
LORNA, M. Detention and its alternatives under international law. The University of Edinburgh. 2026. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1842/44869 (accessed on 20 July 2026).
Meßerschmidt, K. Special interest legislation and legislative capture. In: Oliver-Lalana, A. (eds) Conceptions and Misconceptions of Legislation. Legisprudence Library, Springer, Cham. V. 5, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12068-9_10
PKULAW, Public Security Administrative Penalty Decision Database (2010–first half of 2025) [Dataset] (Beijing: Peking University Law Information House). 2025. Available at: https://www.pkulaw.com/ (accessed on 11 May 2026).
PLEGGENKUHLE, B., KRAS, K. R., SCHAFER, J. A., and HUEBNER, B. M. “Leadership and reform: How law enforcement leaders view rehabilitation and the reduction of collateral harms”. Justice Evaluation Journal, 2026, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2026.2717604
Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China. 2025. Art. 23. Available at: https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/psap-2025/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 11 May 2026).
RAP, S. 8. Children’s rights law in adolescence. Children’s Rights and Children’s Development: An Integrated Approach. New York University Press. 2025, pp. 217-252. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479825509.003.0011
REN, Y., YANG, W., and LI, W. “Alignment between China’s elderly care policies and the integrated theory of social gerontology: A text analysis from 2000 to 2025”. Sustainability, v. 18, n. 4, 2026, pp. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18042017
SARAVAKOS, C., KARKATSOULIS, P., STEFOPOULOU, E., and ARCHONTAS, G. “Assessing better regulation reforms in the in law making process: An empirical study of Greece’s compliance with better regulation criteria from 2015 to 2023 and the effects of regulatory framework reforms”. Regulation & Governance, 2026, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70186
SHORT, J. L., and TOFFEL, M. W. “Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment”. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 55, n. 3, 2010, pp. 361. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.361
SWARTZ, J. Policing, punishment, and the public trust. SSRN. 2026, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7377620
VALVERDE, M. “Jurisdiction and scale: Legal `technicalities’ as resources for theory”. Social & Legal Studies, v. 18, n. 2, 2009, pp. 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909103622
Villarreal, M., MacPherson-Krutsky, C., and Painter, M. A. “Barriers and best practices for inclusive emergency alerts and warnings”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, v. 125, 2025, pp. 105581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105581
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Xiaorui Fu
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los/las autores/as ceden todos sus derechos de autor a la revista Cadernos de Dereito Actual, la cual se encargará de difundir y citar siempre a su autor.
- Los autores/as se comprometen a no enviar el artículo o publicarlo en otra revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/las autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada, siempre que se haga referencia a Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
- Cadernos de Dereito Actual no se hace responsable por ninguno de los artículos publicados en caso de que el/la autor/autora hay incurrido en plagio o alguna política desleal a la hora de redactar y/o enviar su artículo. Cualquier responsabilidad civil o penal corresponderá, siempre, al autor/autora del artículo.
Todos los contenidos publicados en la revista están protegidos bajo una licencia "Creative Commons - Reconocimiento - No Comercial". Toda persona tiene derecho a acceder libremente a los contenidos de la revista.
