Procedural reliability of digital evidence in pre-trial criminal proceedings: A forensic-legal assessment framework
Palabras clave:
Digital Evidence, Procedural Reliability, Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings, Chain Of Custody, Forensic Integrity, Algorithmic Accountability, Criminal ProcedureResumen
This study examines procedural reliability of digital evidence during pre-trial criminal proceedings and addresses the gap between technical integrity, evidentiary authenticity, and procedural legality. Existing legal and forensic approaches focus on judicial admissibility or technical verification, while the development of reliability during investigations remains underexplored. The research defines reliability as an autonomous procedural-legal category formed through compliance with legal safeguards throughout the lifecycle of digital evidence. The study applies a doctrinal-empirical legal-forensic methodology combining doctrinal analysis, procedural reconstruction of evidentiary processes, and adversarial validation modeling. Its empirical basis includes 72 cases involving digital evidence handling at the pre-trial stage. The analysis identifies key reliability criteria: procedural legality, continuity of custody, integrity, authenticity, technical verifiability, and institutional accountability. To operationalize these factors, the study develops the Comprehensive Reliability Index (CRI), a framework for reliability assessment in investigative and prosecutorial practice. Findings indicate that reliability depends primarily on procedural transparency, continuity, and documentation quality rather than technological sophistication alone. The study also shows that technically imperfect evidence may remain reliable when deviations are traceable, justified, and documented. Special attention is given to AI-assisted forensic systems, including explainability, algorithmic accountability, and procedural transparency. The proposed framework supports investigators, prosecutors, forensic specialists, and courts.
Descargas
Referencias
AL-Billeh, T.; AL-Hammouri, A.; Khashashneh, T.; Makhmari, M. A.; Kalbani, H. A. “Digital evidence in human rights violations and international criminal justice”, Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System, v. 4, n. 3, p. 842–871, 2024. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.446
Angel, O. E. M., Mercedes, C. F. Y. M., Elisa, Q. L. A., Joaquin, D. J.; DE OLIVEIRA DIAZ DENY Giovanna, C.; Beatriz, G. Q. G. “Digital evidence as a means of proof in criminal proceedings”, Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, v. 18, n. 4, e04585, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-028
Bérubé, M.; Beaulieu, L.-A., Allard, S.; Denault, V. “From digital trace to evidence: Challenges and insights from a trial case study”, Science Justice, v. 65, n. 5, 101306, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2025.101306
Billah, M. “Developing an explainable AI system for digital forensics: enhancing trust and transparency in flagging events for legal evidence”, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, v. 14, n. 7, p. 6–16, 2025. https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1407000002
CANTELLI-Forti, A.; Longo, G.; Lupia, F.; Russo, E. “WEFT: A consistent and tamper-proof methodology for acquisition of automatically verifiable forensic web evidence”, International Journal of Information Security, v. 24, 81, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-025-00991-8
Casino, F.; Pina, C.; LÓPEZ-Aguilar, P.; Batista, E.; Solanas, A.; Patsakis, C. “SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence”, Journal of Cybersecurity, v. 8, n. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014
Champlain College Online. “Digital forensics and the chain of custody: How is electronic evidence collected and safeguarded?”, 2026. Available at: https://online.champlain.edu/blog/chain-custody-digital-forensics (accessed on 21 January 2026).
COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention). Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2001. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680081561 (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Dufeniuk, O.; Melnyk, N.; Nahorniak, Y.; Melnyk, S. “Innovative potential of 3D technologies in crime investigation”, Social Legal Studios, v. 7, n. 4, p. 222–230, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2024.222
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. “Assessing high-risk AI: Fundamental rights risks”. Publications Office of the European Union, 2025. Available at: https://privacy-web.nl/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/fra-2025-assessing-high-risk-ai-fundamental-rights-risks_en.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Forensic Focus. Forensic Focus legal update July 2021: Reliability and credibility of digital evidence, 2021. Available at: https://www.forensicfocus.com/legal/forensic-focus-legal-update-july-2021-reliability-and-credibility-of-digital-evidence/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Griffiths, C. “The digital forensics project”. Counsel: The Magazine of the Bar of England and Wales, 2025. Available at: https://www.counselmagazine.co.uk/articles/the-digital-forensics-project (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Gruber, J.; Hargreaves, C. J.; Freiling, F. C. “Contamination of digital evidence: Understanding an underexposed risk”, Forensic Science International Digital Investigation, v. 44, 301501, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301501
KIENER-Manu, K. E4J University Module Series: Cybercrime. Module 4: Introduction to Digital Forensics, 2026. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-4/key-issues/standards-and-best-practices-for-digital-forensics.html (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Lasagni, G. “Admissibility of Digital Evidence from Part I - Collecting Digital Evidence”, In V. Franssen S. Tosza (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Digital Evidence in Criminal Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025, p. 126–152. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-digital-evidence-in-criminal-investigations/admissibility-of-digital-evidence/7F8292A7652FF16F5EA850B2984EE0E5 (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Loffi, L.; Camillo, G. L.; DE Souza, C. A.; Westphall, C. M.; Westphall, C. B. “Management of the Chain of Custody of Digital Evidence Using Blockchain and Self-Sovereign Identities: A Systematic Literature review”, IEEE Access, v. 13, p. 77804–77832, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3560191
Loux, M.; Loux, B. “How is digital evidence preserved in modern investigations?“, American Military University, 2025. Available at: https://www.amu.apus.edu/area-of-study/criminal-justice/resources/how-is-digital-evidence-preserved/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Lucoveis, M. L.; Gamba, M.; Silva, E. Q.; Pinto, L. A.; Sacco, I. C. “The effects of the use of customized silicone digital orthoses on pre-ulcerative lesions and plantar pressure during walking in people with diabetic neuropathy: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial”, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, v. 37, 101247, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101247
Lytvyn, N.; Andrushchenko, H.; Zozulya, Y. V.; Nikanorova, O. V.; Rusal, L. M. “Enforcement of court decisions as a social guarantee of protection of citizens rights and freedoms”, PRAWO I WIĘŹ, v. 1, n. 39, p. 80–102, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi39.351
Martinengo, L.; Ng, M. S. P., DE RONG Ng, T.; Ang, Y.; Jabir, A. I.; Kyaw, B. M.; Car, L. T. “Spaced digital education for health professionals: Systematic review and meta-analysis”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 26, e57760, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2196/57760
Masaar. New judicial trend: Criminal court overturns conviction due to invalidity of digital forensic evidence, 2025. Available at: https://masaar.net/en/court-overturns-conviction-due-to-invalidity-of-digital-forensic-evidence/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Meinheit, A. “From bytes to bench: Leveraging digital forensics in the litigation lifecycle”, Complete Legal, 2025. Available at: https://completelegal.us/from-bytes-to-bench-leveraging-digital-forensics-in-the-litigation-lifecycle/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
MindMeister, Online mind mapping tool, 2026. Available at: https://www.mindmeister.com (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Mossé Cyber Security Institute. “Preparing documentation and evidence”. Mossé Cyber Security Institute Library, 2023. Available at: https://library.mosse-institute.com/articles/2023/08/preparing-documentation-and-evidence.html (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Naik, S.; Agarwal, S. When digital evidence fails: The corporate cost of ignoring metadata. LiveLaw, 2026. Available at: https://www.livelaw.in/amp/articles/digital-evidence-indian-corporation-519181 (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Romaniuk, V. V.; Ablamskyi, S. Y. “Criteria for the admissibility of digital (electronic) evidence in criminal proceedings”, Law And Safety, v. 93, n. 2, p. 140–150, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2024.2.13
Rosenstrauch, D., Mangla, U., Gupta, A., & Masau, C. T. “Correction to: Artificial Intelligence and ethics”, In: Meyers, A. (eds) Digital Health Entrepreneurship. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33902-8_17
Shchokin, R.; Oliinyk, V.; Amelin, O.; Bondarenko, Y.; Maziychuk, V.; Kyslenko, D. “Methods of combating offenses in the field of ecology”, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, v. 14, n. 1, 5, 2023, p. 5-15. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.1(65).01
Stoykova, R. “A new right to Procedural accuracy: a governance model for digital evidence in criminal proceedings”, Computer Law Security Review, v. 55, 106040, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040
Supreme Court of Ukraine. A Supreme Court judge analyzed the criteria for admissibility and reliability of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. Judiciary of Ukraine, 2025. Available at: https://court.gov.ua/press/news/1751426/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Supreme Court of Ukraine. Cybercrime and electronic evidence: Supreme Court judge explains the assessment of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, 2024. Available at: https://court.gov.ua/eng/supreme/pres-centr/news/1594957/ (accessed on 21 January 2026).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. “E4J University Module Series: Cybercrime. Module 6: Practical Aspects of Cybercrime Investigations and Digital Forensics”, 2019. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-6/key-issues/digital-evidence-admissibility.html (accessed on 21 January 2026).
UNITED NATIONS. “Report of the Secretary-General on the work of the Organization 2025: Combating drugs, crime and terrorism”, United Nations, 2025. Available at: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sg_annual_report_2025_drugs-crime-terrorism_en.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2026).
Van Krimpen, F., De Bruijn, H., & Arnaboldi, M. “Machine Learning Algorithms and Publicdecision-making: A Conceptual Overview”, In The Routledge Handbook of Public Sector Accounting (1st ed., pp. 124–138). Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group. 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003295945-12
Yermachenko, V. “Theory and practice of public management of smart infrastructure in the conditions of the digital society’ development: Socio-economic aspects”, Economic Affairs, v. 68, n. 1, p. 617-633, 2023. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Serhii Holovkin, Dina Drobenko, Maryna Kulyk, Vadym Butenko , Assol Shulzhenko
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:- Los/las autores/as ceden todos sus derechos de autor a la revista Cadernos de Dereito Actual, la cual se encargará de difundir y citar siempre a su autor.
- Los autores/as se comprometen a no enviar el artículo o publicarlo en otra revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/las autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada, siempre que se haga referencia a Cadernos de Dereito Actual.
- Cadernos de Dereito Actual no se hace responsable por ninguno de los artículos publicados en caso de que el/la autor/autora hay incurrido en plagio o alguna política desleal a la hora de redactar y/o enviar su artículo. Cualquier responsabilidad civil o penal corresponderá, siempre, al autor/autora del artículo.
Todos los contenidos publicados en la revista están protegidos bajo una licencia "Creative Commons - Reconocimiento - No Comercial". Toda persona tiene derecho a acceder libremente a los contenidos de la revista.
